Page 10018
Jun 25, 2017
Agah Bahari speaks with Zoltan Istvan @ Toronto Transhumanism Meetup
Posted by Zoltan Istvan in category: transhumanism
Recorded on Jun.06.2017 @ rangle.io
Zoltan Istvan: http://www.zoltanistvan.com
NEOHUMAN podcast: http://www.lil.fm/neohuman
Continue reading “Agah Bahari speaks with Zoltan Istvan @ Toronto Transhumanism Meetup” »
Jun 25, 2017
The Four Immortality Stories We Tell Ourselves
Posted by Derick Lee in categories: education, life extension, neuroscience
Since the moment humans became aware of their existence, they have been haunted by the knowledge that it will inevitably come to an end and the hope to change this unfortunate fate.
This month, during Brain Bar Budapest – Europe’s leading conference on the future – Stephen Cave talked about the four immortality stories we tell ourselves and how they are changing in the context of new scientific discoveries and technological advancements. Stephen Cave spent a decade studying and teaching philosophy, and was awarded his PhD in metaphysics from the University of Cambridge in 2001. He is Executive Director of the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence and Senior Research Associate at the University of Cambridge.
Continue reading “The Four Immortality Stories We Tell Ourselves” »
Jun 24, 2017
New research suggests problematic memories could be deleted
Posted by Dan Kummer in categories: biological, neuroscience
June 22 (UPI) — In a series of experiments, neuroscientists were able to selectively delete different types of memories stored a single neuron belonging to a marine snail.
The feat, detailed in the journal Current Biology, suggests problematic memories — like those responsible for PSTD and anxiety — in the human brain could be excised without harming other memories.
When the brain stores a traumatic experience in its memory bank, the memory is actually stored in multiple forms. Each memory can include bits of incidental information from the experience. Years later, these incidental, or neutral, memories can trigger panic attacks and severe anxiety.
Continue reading “New research suggests problematic memories could be deleted” »
Jun 24, 2017
Amazon patent reveals drone delivery ‘beehives’
Posted by Dan Kummer in category: drones
Jun 24, 2017
Future Energy: China leads world in solar power production
Posted by Dan Kummer in categories: solar power, sustainability
Jun 24, 2017
This designer made his own crazy version of Super Mario Bros
Posted by Dan Kummer in category: futurism
Jun 24, 2017
Intel Launches Core i9 X-Series CPUs, 10-Core Available Now and 18 in October
Posted by Shailesh Prasad in category: computing
Jun 24, 2017
As of right now, we are not seeing a large neo-luddism or cyber-luddism movement in the U.S. Many younger and older people seem to be busy addressing their emotional impulses towards political left or right wing policies and other issues, that they feel take away or limit their personal freedom
Posted by Dave Holt in category: futurism
Can the U.S. and world live in a psychological state of cyber nihilism? What will the effects look like? What do you think about this? Read More Here…
http://mrfuturist.com/humanity-headed-state-cyber-nihilism/
Read more
Jun 24, 2017
Artificial meat and the problems of ‘-isms’
Posted by Nicola Bagalà in categories: ethics, food, sustainability, transhumanism
Artificial meat and food may be among our best tools to solve the problems of animal cruelty, feeding a growing population, and (in part) global warming. What do vegans and vegetarians think? In favour of cruelty-free lab-grown meat, or against it by principle?
I often say that I am not a fan of ‘-isms’. Not even those supporting the causes I care for, such as transhumanism. I sympathise with some ‘-isms’ (again, such as transhumanism), but I never consider myself a ‘something-ist’. The reason is that, generally, ‘-isms’ have two problems. The first problem is that they almost always support at least some ideas, or make certain claims, which I disagree with or find too fanciful (certain acceptations of ‘mind uploading’ come to mind, but that’s a story for another post). The second problem is that, if you say you’re a something-ist, people will almost surely assume that you endorse, or believe in, some ideas that are really not your thing, merely because such ideas are either an integral part of the relevant something-ism, or are what people think something-ism is about (which may or may not be true). Not to mention the fact that people often regard the dictionary as the ultimate authority on what ‘real’ something-ism is about, cheerfully ignoring all its variants and flavours (which often blur into mainstream something-ism and each other), whose proponents are usually well persuaded that their own something-ism is the real thing—others just got it wrong.
There’s actually a third problem too. Namely, that if they’re not careful, something-ists who are a bit too zealous might end up putting their ideology before the reasons they embraced it in the first place. Sometimes, this can undermine the very objective something-ists intended to achieve with their embracing the ideology and spreading it left and right.
Continue reading “Artificial meat and the problems of ‘-isms’” »
